Is The Future Automated?

From publishing roles and an amazing presentation on Twilight to the beginning of our venture into examining AI, this week had its good share of questions and thought provoking content. There was also a much appreciated pickle costume, at least by me, and I loved seeing everyone else’s costumes too. 

We wrapped up content from week seven, including:

  • Jobs and processes within the publishing industry, including roles and responsibilities of the publisher;
  • A brief discussion on the merit of self-publishing. My group concluded that self-publishing should not be grouped with publishing as a whole;
  • Loss and profit sheets and what the statement contains;
  • Publishing machinery and terms such as blanket roller, Galley, and ARC.
  • Discussed the difference between digitalization and automation
  • Explored artists and writer’s opinions on the topic of AI
  • Intro to periodicals

  We started the discussion of automation prompted by the readings and engaging examples of AI-generated content.

https://www.the-vital-edge.com/publishing-industry/

After going over several articles comparing text written by humans and by AI, the duality was both interesting and shocking.

https://ideas.ted.com/was-this-poem-written-by-a-computer-or-human/

Below, one of the blog descriptions is mine, the other is from Chat GPT (revealed at the end). To evaluate whether content is written by humans or AI, it turns out you’d have to consider what characterizes “human” writing since the distinction varies in difficulty. I found the poetry difficult. The story with dialogue and characters was more obvious. 

This raises some questions; why are some forms of AI-generated text easier to pick out than others? What advancements will have to be made for all forms of texts to be indistinguishable?

  • In this blog post, we’re about to unravel the thrilling tale of publishing in the age of automation, where the power of words meets the wizardry of technology. So, fasten your seatbelts, fellow wordsmiths, because we’re embarking on a literary journey into the future!

  • In the ever-changing publishing industry, it’s hard to determine what the future will hold. Like any industry that relies on digitization, we must question whether AI and automation will replace and dominate human fields. The prospect of this is not at all terrifying, because AI could never replace such an intricate and creative human practice, could it? The opinions are conflicting. Whatever the future holds, automation is sure to have its role among our own. 

It was disturbing that the AI-generated introduction held up well against my own. What could this mean for my future career? Or the industry as a whole?

  This class offered a relevant example of the changing and transitional nature of publishing. Important to publishing is efficiency. This drives the altering of systems, roles, processes, and tools. If and when we join the industry, we must be aware of the capabilities and limitations of automation capabilities. Some processes and roles discussed in class may be subject to replacement by AI to improve said efficiency. 

From: https://www.engati.com/blog/chatgpt-memes

With that, I’ll wrap up the post with next week’s expectations and opportunities in the month ahead:

Leave a comment

Comments (

2

)

  1. yurcheno38b97dd4ee

    Hey, Quin! Thanks for the class recap (I missed that one, unfortunately). Comparing two blog descriptions, I found the first one (AI-generated) to be more like an advertisement than a description; it sounds like it’s selling me cereal :). Your description has a more robust train of thought, a statement-explanation relationship, and a professional tone. AI aims for the “golden middle,” and therefore, I think it can’t replace professional writers and editors. As writers, we strive for perfection and originality, which isn’t the case for today’s AI.

    Like

  2. paigesl

    Hi Quin! This is a really great post! I enjoyed hearing your thoughts on the inevitable use of AI in the publishing industry, and what that means for us as writers. I thought your use of AI to demonstrate its capabilities was a really creative way to add something different to the post. While the AI passage wasn’t necessarily bad, I found it funny that it ended up sounding more like an introduction to a kids show (it reminded me of the Magic School Bus, specifically). Rather then, summarizing a post for a college course. I do think writers will always be necessary in a creative society if we want to produce new and innovative work; however, I don’t want to be naive about the future capabilities of AI. I definitely think there will be a loss of jobs, specifically in the business sector where professional writing is needed.

    Like

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started